Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand's water resource governance

James Lennox, Wendy Proctor, Shona Russell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    International experience has shown that extensive, systematic and structured stakeholder engagement is important in modern water resource governance. Through two case studies in the Canterbury Region, we investigate the emergence of structured and deliberative participatory processes for decision-making in New Zealand. We particularly focus on the use of evaluative criteria and weightings in providing structure for stakeholder deliberations and clarity and transparency in decision-making processes. Some of the benefits of using criteria weightings to reflect individuals' priorities include their ability to bring out the various perspectives and preferences to start the deliberations and increase the understanding of other people's points of views and their knowledge to all of the stakeholders. We consider particular aspects of the New Zealand context, including the development of criteria specific to Maori interests. These case studies lead us to conclude that stakeholder participation in decision-making is beneficial and increasingly necessary to resolve the problems and tensions around the governance of Canterbury's water resources. They also demonstrate that there are numerous practical and systemic barriers that must be overcome if the potential is to be fully realised. We provide recommendations on how such participatory processes can be successfully implemented to produce meaningful and effective outcomes. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1381-1394
    Number of pages14
    JournalEcological Economics
    Volume70
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand's water resource governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this