Strange parts: the metaphysics of non-classical mereologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The dominant theory of parts and wholes – classical extensional mereology – has faced a number of challenges in the recent literature. This article gives a sampling of some of the alleged counterexamples to some of the more controversial principles involving the connections between parthood and identity. Along the way, some of the main revisionary approaches are reviewed. First, counterexamples to extensionality are reviewed. The ‘supplementation’ axioms that generate extensionality are examined more carefully, and a suggested revision is considered. Second, the paper considers an alternative approach that focuses the blame on antisymmetry but allows us to keep natural supplementation axioms. Third, we look at counterexamples to the idempotency of composition and the associated ‘parts just once’ principle. We explore options for developing weaker mereologies that avoid such commitments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)834-845
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strange parts: the metaphysics of non-classical mereologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this