Abstract
Insurgent actors have long exploited broken social contracts in Africa’s weak democracies within their conflictual strategies. Post-9/11, many of Africa’s conflicts additionally tapped into radical Islamist ideologies and tactics first associated with extra-continental Salafi-jihadism. Upon closer examination, however, state failures that generated asymmetric conflicts since the Cold War era remain manifest in these so-called jihadist insurgencies. Focusing on Nigeria and Somalia, this chapter employs a Weberian framework to examine how conflicts with a religious undercurrent have undermined fragile states’ monopoly on violence and security provision. The Somalia case supports a shift from the Weberian state model in discussing the complex drivers of conflict and the roles of non-state actors in areas typically associated with the state and its institutions. Conversely, the Nigeria case is better examined from a Weberian perspective, which considers territorial control and regime ability to exercise writ over the contiguity of its borders as necessary markers of statehood.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The handbook of African defence and armed forces |
| Editors | Evert Kleynhans, Marco Wyss |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 34 |
| Pages | 677-695 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191993688 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198884668 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Insurgency
- Violence
- State failure
- Weberian
- Boko Haram
- al-Shabaab
- Salafi-Jihadism
- AU mission in Somalia
- Multinational joint task force
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'State failure and civil wars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver