Abstract
In this article, we sketch an anatomy of issues and decisions that must be navigated in any attempt to understand coherence and incoherence in ancient Jewish literature, including: the meaning of »coherence,« its relationship to »unity,« the suitability of modern standards of (in)coherence to ancient texts, and the availability of ancient standards of (in)coherence. We argue that modern perspectival representation and modern standards of literary (in)coherence are not necessarily appropriate to ancient Jewish literature, and we propose that these issues can only be properly approached after undertaking an inductive, comprehensive analysis of the ancient Jewish literature itself, in effect, learning the »ways of the text.«
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 94-129 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- Coherence
- Incoherence
- Ancient Jewish literature
- Egyptian art
- Modern art
- Cohesion
- Text linguistics
- Hermeneutics
- Empirical models
- Biblical criticism
- Historical criticism
- Literary criticism
- Literary approach
- Unity
- Literary unity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Standards of (in)coherence in ancient Jewish literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
William Tooman
- School of Divinity - Principal of St Mary's College, Head of School, Professor of Hebrew Bible and Ancient Judaism
Person: Academic
Research output
- 1 Special issue
-
Standards of (in)coherence in ancient Jewish literature
Teeter, D. A. (Editor) & Tooman, W. (Editor), 27 Jul 2020, In: Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel. 9, 2Research output: Contribution to journal › Special issue › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver