Abstract
We study bilateral bargaining problems with an interested third party, the stakeholder, that enjoys benefits upon a bilateral agreement. To address the strategic implications of stakeholders over negotiations, we consider a model where two bargainers interact in the presence of a third party that (a) can transfer a share of her benefits to the bargainers but cannot receive a share of the bilateral surplus, and (b) while she may not participate in all periods of the negotiation, she cannot remain entirely inhibited. Our main findings are:(1) the stakeholder's (reverse) liquidity constraint implies the existence of a multiplicity of stationary subgame perfect equilibria that include outcomes with very asymmetric bilateral agreements, and (2) the partial participation of the stakeholder may be the source of severe inefficiency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 67-77 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Game Theory |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2006 |
Keywords
- bargaining
- stakeholders
- public sector labour
- relations
- third party intervention
- MODEL
- EXTERNALITIES
- INFORMATION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder bargaining games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver