Stagnation and mass loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier: processes, patterns and rates

Sarah Thompson*, Douglas I. Benn, Jordan Mertes, Adrian Luckman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ablation areas of debris-covered glaciers typically consist of a complex mosaic of surface features with contrasting processes and rates of mass loss. This greatly complicates glacier response to climate change, and increases the uncertainty of predictive models. In this paper we present a series of high-resolution DEMs and repeat lake bathymetric surveys on Ngozumpa Glacier, Nepal, to study processes and patterns of mass loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier in unprecedented detail. Most mass loss occurs by melt below supraglacial debris, and melt and calving of ice cliffs (backwasting). Although ice cliffs cover only ∼5% of the area of the lower tongue, they account for 40% of the ablation. The surface debris layer is subject to frequent re-distribution by slope processes, resulting in large spatial and temporal differences in debris-layer thickness, enhancing or inhibiting local ablation rates and encouraging continuous topographic inversion. A moraine-dammed lake on the lower glacier tongue (Spillway Lake) underwent a period of rapid expansion from 2001 to 2009, but later experienced a reduction of area and volume as a result of lake level lowering and sediment redistribution. Rapid lake growth will likely resume in the near future, and may eventually become up to 7 km long.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-485
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Glaciology
Volume62
Issue number233
Early online date19 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Debris-covered glaciers
  • Glacier hazards
  • Glacier mass balance
  • Moraine
  • Remote sensing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stagnation and mass loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier: processes, patterns and rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this