TY - JOUR
T1 - Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Steingart, Karen R
AU - Ng, Vivienne
AU - Henry, Megan
AU - Hopewell, Philip C
AU - Ramsay, Andrew
AU - Cunningham, Jane
AU - Urbanczik, Richard
AU - Perkins, Mark D
AU - Aziz, Mohamed Abdel
AU - Pai, Madhukar
PY - 2006/10
Y1 - 2006/10
N2 - In low-income and middle-income countries, direct (unconcentrated) sputum smear microscopy is the primary method for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis. The method is fast, inexpensive, and specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in high incidence areas. The main limitations of direct microscopy are its relatively low sensitivity, especially in individuals co-infected with HIV, and variable quality of the test in programme conditions. Thus, there is a need to identify methods to improve the sensitivity of microscopy. Physical and chemical sputum processing methods, including centrifugation, sedimentation, and bleach, have been studied and found to show promise. We did a systematic review to assess the ability of different processing methods to improve the sensitivity of microscopy. By searching many sources, we identified 83 studies. Overall, by comparison with direct smears, the results suggested that centrifugation with any of several chemical methods (including bleach) is more sensitive, that overnight sedimentation preceded by chemical processing is more sensitive, and that specificity is similar. There were insufficient data to determine the value of sputum processing methods in patients with HIV infection. Operational studies are needed to determine whether the increased sensitivity provided by processing methods is sufficient to offset their increased cost, complexity, and potential biohazards, and to examine their feasibility.
AB - In low-income and middle-income countries, direct (unconcentrated) sputum smear microscopy is the primary method for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis. The method is fast, inexpensive, and specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in high incidence areas. The main limitations of direct microscopy are its relatively low sensitivity, especially in individuals co-infected with HIV, and variable quality of the test in programme conditions. Thus, there is a need to identify methods to improve the sensitivity of microscopy. Physical and chemical sputum processing methods, including centrifugation, sedimentation, and bleach, have been studied and found to show promise. We did a systematic review to assess the ability of different processing methods to improve the sensitivity of microscopy. By searching many sources, we identified 83 studies. Overall, by comparison with direct smears, the results suggested that centrifugation with any of several chemical methods (including bleach) is more sensitive, that overnight sedimentation preceded by chemical processing is more sensitive, and that specificity is similar. There were insufficient data to determine the value of sputum processing methods in patients with HIV infection. Operational studies are needed to determine whether the increased sensitivity provided by processing methods is sufficient to offset their increased cost, complexity, and potential biohazards, and to examine their feasibility.
KW - Bacteriological Techniques
KW - Humans
KW - Microscopy
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Specimen Handling
KW - Sputum/microbiology
KW - Tuberculosis/diagnosis
U2 - 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70602-8
DO - 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70602-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17008175
SN - 1473-3099
VL - 6
SP - 664
EP - 674
JO - Lancet Infectious Diseases
JF - Lancet Infectious Diseases
IS - 10
ER -