Spinoza’s theophany: the expression of God’s nature by particular things

Alexander X. Douglas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What does Spinoza mean when he claims, as he does several times in the Ethics, that particular things are expressions of God’s nature or attributes? This article interprets these claims as a version of what is called theophany in the Neoplatonist tradition. Theophany is the process by which particular things come to exist as determinate manifestations of a divine nature that is in itself not determinate. Spinoza’s understanding of theophany diverges significantly from that of the Neoplatonist John Scottus Eriugena, largely because he understands the non-determinateness of the divine nature in a very different way. His view is more similar, I argue, to what is presented in the work of Ibn ‘Arabī, under the name “tajallī”.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-69
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Early Modern Studies
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Spinoza
  • Eriugena
  • Ibn ‘Arabī
  • Expression
  • Modes
  • Divine nature
  • Indeterminacy
  • Superdeterminacy
  • Theophany
  • tajallī

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spinoza’s theophany: the expression of God’s nature by particular things'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this