Abstract
Larry Temkin famously argues that what he calls spectrum arguments yield strong reason to reject Transitivity, according to which the ‘all-things-considered better than’ relation is transitive. Spectrum arguments do reveal that the conjunctions of independently plausible claims are inconsistent with Transitivity. But I argue that there is very strong independent reason to reject such conjunctions of claims, and thus that the fact that they are inconsistent with Transitivity does not yield strong reason to reject Transitivity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1729-1744 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 175 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 25 May 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- Spectrum arguments
- Sorites arguments
- Transitivity
- Hypersensitivity
- Temkin
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Theron Pummer
- School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studies - Director of Research
- Philosophy - Professor
- Centre for Energy Ethics
- Centre for the Study of Philanthropy & Public Good
- Centre for Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs - Director
Person: Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver