Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Larry Temkin famously argues that what he calls spectrum arguments yield strong reason to reject Transitivity, according to which the ‘all-things-considered better than’ relation is transitive. Spectrum arguments do reveal that the conjunctions of independently plausible claims are inconsistent with Transitivity. But I argue that there is very strong independent reason to reject such conjunctions of claims, and thus that the fact that they are inconsistent with Transitivity does not yield strong reason to reject Transitivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1729-1744
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume175
Issue number7
Early online date25 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Spectrum arguments
  • Sorites arguments
  • Transitivity
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Temkin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this