Species traits explain variation in detectability of UK birds

Alison Johnston*, Stuart E. Newson, Kate Risely, Andy J. Musgrove, Dario Massimino, Stephen R. Baillie, James W. Pearce-Higgins

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Capsule Heterogeneous detectability amongst species may impact multi-species bird surveys and if not accounted for, may bias community level conclusions. Estimates of detectability were produced for 195 UK bird species, and detectability was significantly affected by bird size, diet and habitat specialization.

Aims To estimate detectability and understand which species traits may impact detectability.

Methods We estimated the detectability of 195 species of birds in the UK using distance sampling methods and examined the average detectability of genetically related groups. We tested the significance of species traits in describing variation in detectability, whilst controlling for phylogenetic relationships.

Results Passeriformes had the lowest median detectability of 0.37 and Charadriiformes the highest median detectability of 0.65, of the seven largest orders considered. Species most associated with closed habitats such as woodland and urban areas had the lowest detectability. Smaller species had lower detectability than larger species.

Conclusion Heterogeneity in species detectability could lead to biased conclusions, particularly when calculating multi-species indices such as species richness or diversity. Accounting for detectability will be most important in studies that cover a wide range of habitat types or a diverse spread of taxa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-350
Number of pages11
JournalBird Study
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • DISTANCE SAMPLING SURVEYS
  • BREEDING BIRD
  • FIELD-EVALUATION
  • POINT COUNTS
  • HABITAT
  • MANAGEMENT
  • ABUNDANCE
  • DENSITY
  • NOISE
  • HETEROGENEITY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Species traits explain variation in detectability of UK birds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this