Special Collection on #MeToo: #MeToo is little more than mob rule // vs // #MeToo is a legitimate form of social justice

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Shortcuts section engages the debate on whether the #MeToo movement is best understood as a form of social justice, bringing heinous acts often shrouded in decades of silence into the public domain, or as mob rule, foregoing official legal channels to summarily shame individuals through unmoderated character assassination. The four contributors offer diverse views on the efficacy of the #MeToo movement to bring forth structural change. They consider the relationship between #MeToo and other longer-running civil rights initiatives, the role of new communication technologies in producing collective suffering, and the need to better contextualize the production of shame. They address questions of how love and desire might fit into twenty-first-century biopolitics, and critically assess the relationship between hashtag movements and institutionalized law.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Special Collection on #MeToo: #MeToo is little more than mob rule // vs // #MeToo is a legitimate form of social justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this