TY - JOUR
T1 - Speaker and accent variation are handled differently
T2 - evidence in native and non-native listeners
AU - Kriengwatana, Buddhamas
AU - Terry, Josephine
AU - Chládková, Kateřina
AU - Escudero, Paola
PY - 2016/6/16
Y1 - 2016/6/16
N2 - Listeners are able to cope with between-speaker variability in speech
that stems from anatomical sources (i.e. individual and sex differences
in vocal tract size) and sociolinguistic sources (i.e. accents). We
hypothesized that listeners adapt to these two types of variation
differently because prior work indicates that adapting to speaker/sex
variability may occur pre-lexically while adapting to accent variability
may require learning from attention to explicit cues (i.e. feedback).
In Experiment 1, we tested our hypothesis by training native Dutch
listeners and Australian-English (AusE) listeners without any experience
with Dutch or Flemish to discriminate between the Dutch vowels /I/ and
/ε/ from a single speaker. We then tested their ability to classify /I/
and /ε/ vowels of a novel Dutch speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change
only), or vowels of a novel Flemish speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change
plus accent change). We found that both Dutch and AusE listeners could
successfully categorize vowels if the change involved a speaker/sex
change, but not if the change involved an accent change. When AusE
listeners were given feedback on their categorization responses to the
novel speaker in Experiment 2, they were able to successfully categorize
vowels involving an accent change. These results suggest that adapting
to accents may be a two-step process, whereby the first step involves
adapting to speaker differences at a pre-lexical level, and the second
step involves adapting to accent differences at a contextual level,
where listeners have access to word meaning or are given feedback that
allows them to appropriately adjust their perceptual category
boundaries.
AB - Listeners are able to cope with between-speaker variability in speech
that stems from anatomical sources (i.e. individual and sex differences
in vocal tract size) and sociolinguistic sources (i.e. accents). We
hypothesized that listeners adapt to these two types of variation
differently because prior work indicates that adapting to speaker/sex
variability may occur pre-lexically while adapting to accent variability
may require learning from attention to explicit cues (i.e. feedback).
In Experiment 1, we tested our hypothesis by training native Dutch
listeners and Australian-English (AusE) listeners without any experience
with Dutch or Flemish to discriminate between the Dutch vowels /I/ and
/ε/ from a single speaker. We then tested their ability to classify /I/
and /ε/ vowels of a novel Dutch speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change
only), or vowels of a novel Flemish speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change
plus accent change). We found that both Dutch and AusE listeners could
successfully categorize vowels if the change involved a speaker/sex
change, but not if the change involved an accent change. When AusE
listeners were given feedback on their categorization responses to the
novel speaker in Experiment 2, they were able to successfully categorize
vowels involving an accent change. These results suggest that adapting
to accents may be a two-step process, whereby the first step involves
adapting to speaker differences at a pre-lexical level, and the second
step involves adapting to accent differences at a contextual level,
where listeners have access to word meaning or are given feedback that
allows them to appropriately adjust their perceptual category
boundaries.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84976271692
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0156870
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0156870
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 11
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 6
M1 - 0156870
ER -