Abstract
Internal migration is responsible for the changing geography of Britain's ethnic group populations. Although this changing geography is at the centre of heated debates of social policy, relatively little is known about the internal migration behaviour of different ethnic groups. This paper reviews existing evidence and analyses 1991 and 2001 Census data to provide an overview of patterns and trends in the geographies of migration for each ethnic group. It finds that counter-urbanisation is common to all ethnic groups except Chinese. Both White and minority groups have on balance moved from the most non-White areas in similar proportions, with some exceptions including White movement into the most concentrated Black areas, and Chinese movement towards its own urban concentrations. 'White flight' is not an appropriate term to describe White movement, nor to explain the growth of ethnically diverse urban areas.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-56 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Population, Space and Place |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jun 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Britain
- Census
- Ethnic group
- Geography
- Internal migration
- Segregation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial patterns of internal migration: Evidence for ethnic groups in Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver