Spatial agency bias and word order flexibility: a comparison of 14 European languages

Caterina Suitner*, Anne Maass, Eduardo Navarrete, Magdalena Formanowicz, Boyka Bratanova, Carmen Cervone, Juho Eemeli Hakoköngäs, Toon Kuppens, Eleni Lipourli, Tamara Rakić, Andrea Scatolon, Catia P. Teixeira, Zhenlan Wang, Maria Pedro Sobral, Antonin Carrier

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)


The spatial agency bias predicts that people whose native language is rightward written will predominantly envisage action along the same direction. Two mechanisms contribute jointly to this asymmetry: (a) an embodied process related to writing/reading; (b) a linguistic regularity according to which sentence subjects (typically the agent) tend to precede objects (typically the recipient). Here we test a novel hypothesis in relation to the second mechanism, namely, that this asymmetry will be most pronounced in languages with rigid word order. A preregistered study on 14 European languages (n = 420) varying in word order flexibility confirmed a rightward bias in drawings of interactions between two people (agent and recipient). This bias was weaker in more flexible languages, confirming that embodied and linguistic features of language interact in producing it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-671
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
Issue number3
Early online date10 Feb 2021
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2021


  • Cross-linguistic
  • Word order
  • Spatial agency bias


Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial agency bias and word order flexibility: a comparison of 14 European languages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this