Sovereignty after Empire: Comparing the Middle East and Central Asia

Sally N. Cummings, Raymond Hinnebusch

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

A comparative study of empire in the Middle East and Central Asia.Empire matters for post-imperial outcomes, as is shown in this comparative study. The imperial creation of states in MENA and Central Asia explains several similarities in both regions’ successor states. Differences in imperial heritages also partly account for the greater instability of the MENA states system and their lesser legitimacy.While eventually the imperial relation to an external metropole came to an end, the social patterns and institutional practices forged in these relationships remained; some only as traces, but others that endured in the transformation of empire into something else, a national sovereignty which should be seen as more than ‘neo-colonialism’ but less than ‘total independence’. This challenges the view of an automatic linear progression from empire to sovereignty and indeed, suggests the two conditions can and do co-exist.Key Features*Combines theory and empirical evidence*Makes systematic comparisons between the Middle East and Central Asia*Includes chapters from leading scholars from history, politics and international relations*Presents the findings of a focused collective research project.

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
PublisherEdinburgh University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780748647545
ISBN (Print)9780748643042
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Empire
  • Sovereignty
  • Middle East
  • Central Asia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sovereignty after Empire: Comparing the Middle East and Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this