Song complexity is maintained during inter-population cultural transmission of humpback whale songs

Jenny A. Allen*, Ellen Clare Garland, Claire Garrigue, Rebecca A. Dunlop, Michael J. Noad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Among animal species, the songs of male humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are a rare example of social learning between entire populations. Understanding fine-scale similarity in song patterns and structural features will better clarify how accurately songs are learned during inter-population transmission. Here, six distinct song types (2009-2015) transmitted from the east Australian to New Caledonian populations were quantitatively analysed using fine-scale song features. Results found that New Caledonian whales learned each song type with high accuracy regardless of the pattern’s complexity. However, there were rare instances of themes (stereotyped patterns of sound units) only sung by a single population. These occurred more often in progressively changing ‘evolutionary’ songs compared to rapidly changing ‘revolutionary’ songs. Our results suggest that populations do not need to reduce complexity to accurately learn song patterns. Populations may also incorporate changes and embellishments into songs in the form of themes which are suggested to be learnt as distinct segments. Maintaining complex song patterns with such accuracy suggests significant acoustic contact, supporting the hypothesis that song learning may occur on shared feeding grounds or migration routes. This study improves the understanding of inter-population mechanisms for large-scale cultural transmission in animals.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8999
Number of pages9
JournalScientific Reports
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Song complexity is maintained during inter-population cultural transmission of humpback whale songs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this