Social mixing as a cure for negative neighbourhood effects: Evidence based policy or urban myth?

David John Manley, Maarten Van Ham, Joe Doherty

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This chapter begins by outlining the rhetoric of neighbourhood social mix and then turns to critique this through quantitative research that investigates the effect of different levels of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on transitions from unemployment to employment, and the probability of staying in employment for those with a job. It uses individual-level data from the Scottish Longitudinal Study, a 5.3% sample of the Scottish population, covering a 10-year period. The findings are that the characteristics of direct neighbours and those living in neighbouring streets are more important than the characteristics of the wider neighbourhood. They find long-lasting negative effects of living in deprived neighbourhoods, but only a small, if significant, benefit of living in mixed tenure (40–80% social housing) streets and blocks for the unemployed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?
    Place of PublicationBristol
    PublisherPolicy Press
    Pages151-168
    Number of pages18
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Social mixing as a cure for negative neighbourhood effects: Evidence based policy or urban myth?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this