TY - JOUR
T1 - Slavery in Achaemenid-period Babylonia
T2 - the social world of Rībat, son of Bēl-erība
AU - King, Rhyne
AU - Pirngruber, Reinhard
N1 - The research presented in this article was funded in part by National Science Foundation (grant number ACI-1450455). Rhyne King held a Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowship while writing this paper. Reinhard Pirngruber’s research for this article took place under the auspices of the Austrian Science Fund’s project P30311, “Astronomical Diaries Digital.”
PY - 2022/5/25
Y1 - 2022/5/25
N2 - This paper argues for a historically grounded view of slavery in Achaemenid-period Babylonia by examining the life of one particular individual, Rībat son of Bēl-erība, an ardu of the Murašû family (whose archive spans c. 454–404 BCE). In contrast to other studies which focus on the terminology or legal aspects of slavery, we examine the lived experience of Rībat. We do this in two ways. First, we study all of Rībat’s attested business ventures and demonstrate that, although Rībat occasionally acted under the direct orders of his masters, he more often pursued activities ancillary to those of the core Murašû business. Secondly, we use social network analysis of over 700 Murašû texts to demonstrate that, although Rībat was crucial in linking distinct individuals to the Murašû business, he lay outside his masters’ group of core associates. We then compare Rībat’s social position to that of other known Murašû subordinates to argue that Rībat’s experience was representative of that of other Murašû subordinates. We conclude by arguing for more social-historical studies of Babylonian servitude in the future.
AB - This paper argues for a historically grounded view of slavery in Achaemenid-period Babylonia by examining the life of one particular individual, Rībat son of Bēl-erība, an ardu of the Murašû family (whose archive spans c. 454–404 BCE). In contrast to other studies which focus on the terminology or legal aspects of slavery, we examine the lived experience of Rībat. We do this in two ways. First, we study all of Rībat’s attested business ventures and demonstrate that, although Rībat occasionally acted under the direct orders of his masters, he more often pursued activities ancillary to those of the core Murašû business. Secondly, we use social network analysis of over 700 Murašû texts to demonstrate that, although Rībat was crucial in linking distinct individuals to the Murašû business, he lay outside his masters’ group of core associates. We then compare Rībat’s social position to that of other known Murašû subordinates to argue that Rībat’s experience was representative of that of other Murašû subordinates. We conclude by arguing for more social-historical studies of Babylonian servitude in the future.
KW - Slavery
KW - Achaemenid Empire
KW - Babylonia
KW - Social networks
KW - Nippur
U2 - 10.1515/janeh-2020-0025
DO - 10.1515/janeh-2020-0025
M3 - Article
SN - 2328-9554
VL - 9
SP - 113
EP - 145
JO - Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History
JF - Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History
IS - 1
ER -