Abstract
Which additional epistemic skills or attributes must a competent journalist possess in order to produce competent science journalism? I aim to answer this question by bringing together insights from journalism, science communication, and epistemology. In Section 2, I outline the Epistemic Challenge for Science Journalism. In Section 3, I present the dominant answer in the literature, the Knowledge-Based Solution, and argue against it. In Section 4, I propose an alternative, the Confirmation-Based Solution. In Section 5, I argue that this solution can address recent concerns regarding journalistic objectivity. Section 6 discusses my proposal in the context of epistemological debates about norms of assertion. Section 7 concludes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | FirstView |
| Early online date | 26 Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 26 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- Journalism
- Science journalism
- Science communication
- Fact-checking
- Objectivity
- Epistemology
- Applied epistemology
- Assertion