Should science journalists know science?

Viviane Fairbank*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Which additional epistemic skills or attributes must a competent journalist possess in order to produce competent science journalism? I aim to answer this question by bringing together insights from journalism, science communication, and epistemology. In Section 2, I outline the Epistemic Challenge for Science Journalism. In Section 3, I present the dominant answer in the literature, the Knowledge-Based Solution, and argue against it. In Section 4, I propose an alternative, the Confirmation-Based Solution. In Section 5, I argue that this solution can address recent concerns regarding journalistic objectivity. Section 6 discusses my proposal in the context of epistemological debates about norms of assertion. Section 7 concludes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
VolumeFirstView
Early online date26 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Journalism
  • Science journalism
  • Science communication
  • Fact-checking
  • Objectivity
  • Epistemology
  • Applied epistemology
  • Assertion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should science journalists know science?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this