Abstract
Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality are among the most robust in the literature. The present article evaluated the hypothesis that both can be explained by a sex difference in the willingness to take impulsive risks. Self-report data were gathered from 3,775 respondents (1,514 female) on same-sex aggression, sociosexuality, and risky impulsivity. Risky impulsivity was higher for men than for women (d = .34) and path analysis showed it to be a common cause of same-sex aggression and sociosexuality for both sexes. However, it did not completely mediate the sex differences in same-sex aggression and sociosexuality. The results suggest that same-sex aggression and sociosexual behavior share a common psychological mechanism, but that fully explaining sex differences in aggression requires a more sensitive assay of impulsive risk and a consideration of dyadic processes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 779-792 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Evolutionary Psychology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- direct aggression
- impulsivity
- risk taking
- sex differences
- sociosexuality
- GENDER-DIFFERENCES
- VIOLENCE
- WOMEN
- COMPETITIVENESS
- METAANALYSIS
- PERSONALITY
- ESCALATION
- CHILDHOOD
- SEXUALITY
- EVOLUTION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Differences in Same-Sex Direct Aggression and Sociosexuality: The Role of Risky Impulsivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver