Abstract
The paper discusses Seneca’s phrase ‘human rights’ (ius humanum) in On Benefits 3 and relates the passage to recent debates about human rights in Stoicism and ancient philosophy. I argue that the Latin phrase refers either to rights or to a law conferring rights. The difference between the passage and a common expectation for human rights lies in the kind of relation between right and duty. In Seneca’s passage the right does not in itself have a correlative duty on the part of other people, and yet it does, if exercised through benefactions, create a duty in others. By contrast, the relation between right and duty is usually expected to be unconditional.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 189-201 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Apeiron |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 21 Aug 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- Seneca
- Human rights
- Society
- Benefits