Self-categorisation and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies

M Levine, Clare Cassidy, G Brazier, Stephen David Reicher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

261 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper outlines a new approach to the study of bystander intervention. Using insights derived from self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), we explore the social category relations among those present in the context of physical violence. The paper describes two experiments that manipulate the social category relations between (a) bystander and fellow bystanders, and (b) bystander and victim. Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in-group rather than out-group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in-group as opposed to out-group members. Overall, the findings suggest an important role for a self-categorization perspective in developing strategies to promote bystander intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1452-1463
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume32
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2002

Keywords

  • SOCIAL IDENTITY
  • EMERGENCY
  • BEHAVIOR
  • AROUSAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-categorisation and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this