Abstract
The three main approaches in statistical inference – classical statistics, Bayesian and likelihood – are in current use in phylogeny research. The three approaches are discussed and compared, with particular emphasis on theoretical properties illustrated by simple thought-experiments. The methods are problematic on axiomatic grounds (classical statistics), extra-mathematical grounds relating to the use of a prior (Bayesian inference) or practical grounds (likelihood). This essay aims to increase understanding of these limits among those with an interest in phylogeny.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-525 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Biology and Philosophy |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 19 Jul 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2015 |
Keywords
- Phylogeny
- Statistics
- Bayesian inference
- Classical statistics
- Likelihood
- Philosophy of science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Seeing the wood for the trees: philosophical aspects of classical, Bayesian and likelihood approaches in statistical inference and some implications for phylogenetic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver