Schleiermacher's reduction of incarnation to deification

Jared Michelson

doi:10.1017/S0036930623000376

Schleiermacher's reduction of incarnation to deification

Jared Michelson^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Divinity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Schleiermacher's theological champions like Kevin Hector contend that his Christology is ‘high’ and is Chalcedonian in spirit. I offer a number of objections to this view, suggesting that Schleiermacher offers a distinctive, early modern account of Christ as a uniquely deified redeemer but not of Christ as the uncreated God. This raises some surprising questions for the dogmatic relation of Christology, soteriology and anthropology.

Original language	English
Number of pages	15
Journal	Scottish Journal of Theology
Volume	First View
Early online date	31 Jul 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930623000376
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 31 Jul 2023

Keywords

Christology
Deification
Friedrich Schleiermacher
Kevin Hector
Theosis

Access to Document

10.1017/S0036930623000376Licence: CC BY

Michelson_2023_SJT_Schleiermachers-reduction_CC
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 210 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{8a3725dc98464ef4989c23e79f3cfb06,

title = "Schleiermacher's reduction of incarnation to deification",

abstract = "Schleiermacher's theological champions like Kevin Hector contend that his Christology is {\textquoteleft}high{\textquoteright} and is Chalcedonian in spirit. I offer a number of objections to this view, suggesting that Schleiermacher offers a distinctive, early modern account of Christ as a uniquely deified redeemer but not of Christ as the uncreated God. This raises some surprising questions for the dogmatic relation of Christology, soteriology and anthropology.",

keywords = "Christology, Deification, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Kevin Hector, Theosis",

author = "Jared Michelson",

year = "2023",

month = jul,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1017/S0036930623000376",

language = "English",

volume = "First View",

journal = "Scottish Journal of Theology",

issn = "0036-9306",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Schleiermacher's reduction of incarnation to deification

AU - Michelson, Jared

PY - 2023/7/31

Y1 - 2023/7/31

N2 - Schleiermacher's theological champions like Kevin Hector contend that his Christology is ‘high’ and is Chalcedonian in spirit. I offer a number of objections to this view, suggesting that Schleiermacher offers a distinctive, early modern account of Christ as a uniquely deified redeemer but not of Christ as the uncreated God. This raises some surprising questions for the dogmatic relation of Christology, soteriology and anthropology.

AB - Schleiermacher's theological champions like Kevin Hector contend that his Christology is ‘high’ and is Chalcedonian in spirit. I offer a number of objections to this view, suggesting that Schleiermacher offers a distinctive, early modern account of Christ as a uniquely deified redeemer but not of Christ as the uncreated God. This raises some surprising questions for the dogmatic relation of Christology, soteriology and anthropology.

KW - Christology

KW - Deification

KW - Friedrich Schleiermacher

KW - Kevin Hector

KW - Theosis

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85167681111

U2 - 10.1017/S0036930623000376

DO - 10.1017/S0036930623000376

M3 - Article

SN - 0036-9306

VL - First View

JO - Scottish Journal of Theology

JF - Scottish Journal of Theology

ER -

Schleiermacher's reduction of incarnation to deification

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this