Romanization 2.0 and its alternatives

Greg Woolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay argues that Romanization revolves around understanding objects in motion and that Roman archaeologists should therefore focus on (1) globalization theory and (2) material-culture studies as important theoretical directions for the (near) future. The present state and scope of the Romanization debate, however, seem to prevent a fruitful development in that direction. The first part of this paper therefore briefly analyses the Romanization debate and argues that large parts of ‘Anglo-Saxon Roman archaeology’ have never been really post-colonial, but in fact from the mid1990s onwards developed a theoretical position that should be characterized as anticolonial.
This ideologically motivated development has resulted in several unhealthy
divides within the field, as well as in an uncomfortable ending of the Romanization debate. The present consensus within English-speaking Roman archaeology ‘to do away with Romanization’ does not seem to get us at all ‘beyond Romans and Natives’, and, moreover, has effectively halted most of the discussion about how to understand and conceptualize ‘Rome’. The second part of the article presents two propositions outlining how to move forward: globalization theory and material-culture studies. Through this focus we will be able to better understand ‘Rome’ as (indicating) objects in motion and the human–thing entanglements resulting from a remarkable punctuation of connectivity. This focus is important as an alternative perspective to all existing narratives about Romanization because these remain fundamentally historical, in the sense that they reduce objects to expressions (of identity) alone.
It is time for our discussions about ‘Rome’ to move ‘beyond representation’ and to become genuinely archaeological at last, by making material culture, with its agency and materiality, central to the analyses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-50
Number of pages6
JournalArchaeological Dialogues
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date16 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Romanization
  • Post-colonial Roman archaeology
  • Globalization
  • Material-culture studies
  • The object turn
  • Material agency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Romanization 2.0 and its alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this