Retrospective PhD by publication in the UK: a rapid review on educational research commentaries

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    As a form of alternative PhD, Retrospective PhD by Publication has been gaining popularity in UK universities, especially among experienced higher education practitioners who have substantial teaching and research experiences. Researchers have argued that a Retrospective PhD by Publication prepares candidates to excel in academia in terms of research capacity although some underscore the lack of support for candidates pursuing this doctoral route. Adopting a case study approach focusing on the discipline of Education, this chapter presents a genre analysis of six Retrospective PhD by Publication theses, focusing on their commentary component. Employing a recently developed policy-based structural framework of written commentary for a Retrospective PhD by Publication (Chong, 2021), a total of 61 structural moves were identified from these commentaries. Findings suggest that there are great variations in terms of the number of structural moves employed in the six commentaries, exhibiting individual approaches to structuring Retrospective PhD by Publication commentaries even within a small sample in a single academic discipline. Implications related to institutional policies and professional development of supervisors are discussed, as well as future research directions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLandscapes and narratives of PhD by publication
    Subtitle of host publicationdemystifying students’ and supervisors’ perspectives
    EditorsSin Wang Chong, Neil Johnson
    Place of PublicationCham
    PublisherSpringer
    Chapter4
    Pages47-71
    Number of pages25
    ISBN (Electronic)9783031048951
    ISBN (Print)9783031048944, 9783031048975
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Sept 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective PhD by publication in the UK: a rapid review on educational research commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this