Responsible agent deliberation

Douglas Walton; Alice Toniolo

Responsible agent deliberation

School of Computer Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Our question is whether by adhering to the designed rules of today’s deliberation dialogue protocols, intelligent rational agents can act fairly, transparently and responsibly. In this paper, we propose some reflections and guidelines on how
deliberation dialogue should be held to these principles using norms to define protocols.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Reason to Dissent
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Volume
Editors	Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert van Laar, Bart Verheij
Publisher	College Publications
Pages	391-405
Number of pages	15
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2020
Event	3rd European Conference on Argumentation 2019 - Groningen, Netherlands Duration: 24 Jun 2019 → 27 Jun 2019 Conference number: 3 https://ecargument.org/

Conference

Conference	3rd European Conference on Argumentation 2019
Abbreviated title	ECA 2019
Country/Territory	Netherlands
City	Groningen
Period	24/06/19 → 27/06/19
Internet address	https://ecargument.org/

Keywords

Deliberation dialogue
Multiagent systems
Responsibility to protect

Cite this

@inproceedings{6332b95343f54a69a9fa49635c384a8f,

title = "Responsible agent deliberation",

abstract = "Our question is whether by adhering to the designed rules of today{\textquoteright}s deliberation dialogue protocols, intelligent rational agents can act fairly, transparently and responsibly. In this paper, we propose some reflections and guidelines on howdeliberation dialogue should be held to these principles using norms to define protocols.",

keywords = "Deliberation dialogue, Multiagent systems, Responsibility to protect",

author = "Douglas Walton and Alice Toniolo",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "English",

pages = "391--405",

editor = "Novaes, {Catarina Dutilh} and Henrike Jansen and {van Laar}, {Jan Albert} and Bart Verheij",

booktitle = "Reason to Dissent",

publisher = "College Publications",

note = "3rd European Conference on Argumentation 2019, ECA 2019 ; Conference date: 24-06-2019 Through 27-06-2019",

url = "https://ecargument.org/",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Responsible agent deliberation

AU - Walton, Douglas

AU - Toniolo, Alice

N1 - Conference code: 3

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - Our question is whether by adhering to the designed rules of today’s deliberation dialogue protocols, intelligent rational agents can act fairly, transparently and responsibly. In this paper, we propose some reflections and guidelines on howdeliberation dialogue should be held to these principles using norms to define protocols.

AB - Our question is whether by adhering to the designed rules of today’s deliberation dialogue protocols, intelligent rational agents can act fairly, transparently and responsibly. In this paper, we propose some reflections and guidelines on howdeliberation dialogue should be held to these principles using norms to define protocols.

KW - Deliberation dialogue

KW - Multiagent systems

KW - Responsibility to protect

UR - https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 391

EP - 405

BT - Reason to Dissent

A2 - Novaes, Catarina Dutilh

A2 - Jansen, Henrike

A2 - van Laar, Jan Albert

A2 - Verheij, Bart

PB - College Publications

T2 - 3rd European Conference on Argumentation 2019

Y2 - 24 June 2019 through 27 June 2019

ER -

Responsible agent deliberation

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this