Abstract
This Correspondence takes issue with the repeated use of the term “energy bullying” by authors Monyei, Jenkins, Serestina and Adewumi in their paper Energy Policy 119 (2018)pp68-76. Reasons are advanced why the authors' criticism of the global north lacks clear empirical evidence, and risks undermining efforts to combat climate change. A more constructive approach of working together between global south and global north is put forward by the corresponding authors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 44-46 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Energy Policy |
| Volume | 132 |
| Early online date | 21 May 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Climate change
- Energy justice
- Global north
- Global south
- Renewable energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to “Monyei, Jenkins, Serestina and Adewumi examining energy sufficiency and energy mobility in the global south through the energy justice framework”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver