TY - JOUR
T1 - Response of fish stocks in Lake Victoria to enforcement of the ban on illegal fishing
T2 - are there lessons for management?
AU - Nyamweya, C.S.
AU - Natugonza, V.
AU - Kashindye, B.B.
AU - Mangeni-Sande, R.
AU - Kagoya, E.
AU - Mpomwenda, V.
AU - Mziri, V.
AU - Elison, M.
AU - Mlaponi, E.
AU - Ongore, C.
AU - Makori, A.
AU - Shaban, S.S.
AU - Aura, C.M.
AU - Kayanda, R.
AU - Taabu-Munyaho, A.
AU - Njiru, J.
AU - Ogari, Z.
AU - Proud, R.
AU - Brierley, A.S.
N1 - Funding: We are grateful to the Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization (LVFO) for sourcing funding and coordinating hydroacoustic surveys on Lake Victoria. We wish to thank the Directors of Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), National Fisheries Resources Research Institute (NaFIRRI), and Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute for logistical support during the surveys.
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - Most small-scale inland fisheries in the Global South prohibit fishing gear with smaller meshes than is legally permitted. Nonetheless, in most instances, this is not strictly enforced. But starting in 2017, Uganda and Tanzania ramped up enforcement on Lake Victoria. We used time series hydro-acoustic data to determine whether the strict enforcement achieved the management goal of increased biomass (t) of commercial species and an increase in the biomass of big Nile perch (>50 cm). The biomass for 2018–2021 (under strict enforcement) was expected to be greater than in 2007–2017 (prior to strict enforcement). The biomass of key species fluctuated annually, but no spatial or temporal differences in biomass associated with strict enforcement were evident. Similarly, the biomass of big Nile perch did not increase. Our findings suggest that mesh sizes may have limited influence on fish biomass dynamics in Lake Victoria, and that high primary productivity of the lake, high turnover rates of fish species, and limited compliance by fishers likely counteract the effects of high fishing effort on biomass and size structure of fish. Therefore, the high cost of strict top-down enforcement and the societal cost of lost lives, jobs, and livelihoods may not be justified.
AB - Most small-scale inland fisheries in the Global South prohibit fishing gear with smaller meshes than is legally permitted. Nonetheless, in most instances, this is not strictly enforced. But starting in 2017, Uganda and Tanzania ramped up enforcement on Lake Victoria. We used time series hydro-acoustic data to determine whether the strict enforcement achieved the management goal of increased biomass (t) of commercial species and an increase in the biomass of big Nile perch (>50 cm). The biomass for 2018–2021 (under strict enforcement) was expected to be greater than in 2007–2017 (prior to strict enforcement). The biomass of key species fluctuated annually, but no spatial or temporal differences in biomass associated with strict enforcement were evident. Similarly, the biomass of big Nile perch did not increase. Our findings suggest that mesh sizes may have limited influence on fish biomass dynamics in Lake Victoria, and that high primary productivity of the lake, high turnover rates of fish species, and limited compliance by fishers likely counteract the effects of high fishing effort on biomass and size structure of fish. Therefore, the high cost of strict top-down enforcement and the societal cost of lost lives, jobs, and livelihoods may not be justified.
KW - Biomass
KW - Fishery regulations
KW - Illegal fishing gear
KW - Nile perch
KW - Size structure
KW - Strict enforcement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85149807266
U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2023.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2023.01.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0380-1330
VL - 49
SP - 531
EP - 544
JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research
JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research
IS - 2
ER -