Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded

Gerald G Singh, Vinicius F Farjalla, Bing Chen, Andrew E Pelling, Elvan Ceyhan, Martin Dominik, Eva Alisic, Jeremy Kerr, Noelle E Selin, Ghada Bassioni, Elena Bennett, Andrew H Kemp, Kai MA Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Maintaining the continued flow of benefits from science, as well as societal support for science, requires sustained engagement between the research community and the general public. On the basis of data from an international survey of 1092 participants (634 established researchers and 458 students) in 55 countries and 315 research institutions, we found that institutional recognition of engagement activities is perceived to be undervalued relative to the societal benefit of those activities. Many researchers report that their institutions do not reward engagement activities despite institutions’ mission statements promoting such engagement. Furthermore, institutions that actually measure engagement activities do so only to a limited extent. Most researchers are strongly motivated to engage with the public for selfless reasons, which suggests that incentives focused on monetary benefits or career progress may not align with researchers’ values. If institutions encourage researchers’ engagement activities in a more appropriate way – by moving beyond incentives – they might better achieve their institutional missions and bolster the crucial contributions of researchers to society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-382
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume17
Issue number7
Early online date30 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this