TY - JOUR
T1 - Research data meets research information management
T2 - CRIS2014
AU - Clements, Anna
AU - McCutcheon, Valerie
N1 - We would like to thank Jisc who supporting this work [grant number DIINNAA].
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - This paper will describe how two research-intensive universities in the UK, St Andrews and Glasgow, have worked together over several years and projects to develop their institutional research management systems to deliver services to support the rapidly evolving needs of funders, institutional policy makers and management, and, importantly, the researchers themselves. This challenge is particularly acute at the moment with ‘Open Science’ one of the hottest topics around with organisations and funders from the G81 downwards stressing the importance of open data in driving everything from global innovation through to more accountable governance; not to mention the more direct possibility that non-compliance could result in research grant income drying up. There is a need to work with those researchers that need support to develop research data management processes and infrastructures that complement their ways of working and not just impose box-ticking exercises. We will explain the strategies, systems developed, and concerns arising to date at our two Universities to help support researchers and managers in this (r)evolution.
AB - This paper will describe how two research-intensive universities in the UK, St Andrews and Glasgow, have worked together over several years and projects to develop their institutional research management systems to deliver services to support the rapidly evolving needs of funders, institutional policy makers and management, and, importantly, the researchers themselves. This challenge is particularly acute at the moment with ‘Open Science’ one of the hottest topics around with organisations and funders from the G81 downwards stressing the importance of open data in driving everything from global innovation through to more accountable governance; not to mention the more direct possibility that non-compliance could result in research grant income drying up. There is a need to work with those researchers that need support to develop research data management processes and infrastructures that complement their ways of working and not just impose box-ticking exercises. We will explain the strategies, systems developed, and concerns arising to date at our two Universities to help support researchers and managers in this (r)evolution.
KW - CERIF
KW - Research information management
KW - Research data management
KW - CRIS-IR
KW - Institutional repository
UR - http://dspacecris.eurocris.org/jspui/handle/123456789/184
U2 - 10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.033
DO - 10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.033
M3 - Article
SN - 1877-0509
VL - 33
SP - 199
EP - 206
JO - Procedia Computer Science
JF - Procedia Computer Science
Y2 - 13 May 2014 through 15 May 2014
ER -