Reputation in a box. Objects, communication and trust in late 18th-century botanical networks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines how and why information moved or failed to move within transatlantic botanical networks in the late eighteenth century. It addresses the problem of how practitioners created relationships of trust, and the difficulties they faced in transferring reputations between national contexts. Eighteenth-century botany was characteristically cross-cultural, cosmopolitan and socially diverse, yet in the 1770s and 1780s the American Revolutionary Wars placed these attributes under strain. The paper analyses the British and French networks that surrounded the Philadelphian plant hunter William Young (1742–1785), to show how botanists and plant collectors created and maintained connections with each other, especially when separated by geographical and cultural distance. It highlights in particular the role played by commercial plant traders, and demonstrates how practitioners used objects to transmit social as well as scholarly information. The transnational circulation of information and knowledge in the Enlightenment was determined by culturally specific judgements about trust, confidence, communication and risk. Despite the prominent role played by material culture within these networks, scholars continued to place high value on face-to-face contact as a means of judging the trustworthiness and cooperation of their agents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-208
JournalHistory of Science
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Keywords

  • American Revolution
  • Botany
  • Britain
  • Commerce
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • France
  • Material culture
  • Networks
  • Reputation
  • Trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reputation in a box. Objects, communication and trust in late 18th-century botanical networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this