Reply to Eaton and Pickavance

Brian James Weatherson

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2016


  • Knowledge
  • Interests
  • Gettier cases


Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Eaton and Pickavance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this