Reply to "Comment on 'Perfect imaging with positive refraction in three dimensions'"

Ulf Leonhardt; Thomas G. Philbin

doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802

Reply to "Comment on 'Perfect imaging with positive refraction in three dimensions'"

Ulf Leonhardt, Thomas G. Philbin

School of Physics and Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Abstract

Exact time-dependent solutions of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye show that perfect imaging is not an artifact of a drain at the image, although a drain is required for subwavelength resolution.

Original language	English
Article number	057802
Pages (from-to)	-
Number of pages	2
Journal	Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics
Volume	82
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802
Publication status	Published - 30 Nov 2010

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802

Cite this

@article{1f6b0acd97d44ce1ae197ae618c48c4c,

title = "Reply to {"}Comment on 'Perfect imaging with positive refraction in three dimensions'{"}",

abstract = "Exact time-dependent solutions of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye show that perfect imaging is not an artifact of a drain at the image, although a drain is required for subwavelength resolution.",

author = "Ulf Leonhardt and Philbin, {Thomas G.}",

year = "2010",

month = nov,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802",

language = "English",

volume = "82",

pages = "--",

journal = "Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics",

issn = "1050-2947",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "Comment on 'Perfect imaging with positive refraction in three dimensions'"

AU - Leonhardt, Ulf

AU - Philbin, Thomas G.

PY - 2010/11/30

Y1 - 2010/11/30

N2 - Exact time-dependent solutions of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye show that perfect imaging is not an artifact of a drain at the image, although a drain is required for subwavelength resolution.

AB - Exact time-dependent solutions of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye show that perfect imaging is not an artifact of a drain at the image, although a drain is required for subwavelength resolution.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.057802

M3 - Editorial

SN - 1050-2947

VL - 82

SP - -

JO - Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics

JF - Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics

IS - 5

M1 - 057802

ER -

Reply to "Comment on 'Perfect imaging with positive refraction in three dimensions'"

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this