Reply on the Comment on Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements

T Kiss; U Herzog; Ulf Leonhardt

Reply on the Comment on Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements

T Kiss, U Herzog, Ulf Leonhardt

School of Physics and Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The authors of the preceding Comment [G. M. D'Ariano and C. Macchiavello, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3131 (1998)] tried to reestablish a 0.5 efficiency bound for loss compensation in optical homodyne tomography. In our reply we demonstrate that neither does such a rigorous bound exist nor is the bound required for ruling out the state reconstruction of an individual system [G. M. D'Ariano and H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2832 (1996)].

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3134-3135
Number of pages	2
Journal	Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics
Volume	57
Publication status	Published - Apr 1998

Keywords

OPTICAL HOMODYNE TOMOGRAPHY
DENSITY-MATRIX
NUMBER
STATISTICS
DISTRIBUTIONS
VACUUM
FIELD

Cite this

@article{fc0f7af011f5435289e717d3a808d58f,

title = "Reply on the Comment on Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements",

abstract = "The authors of the preceding Comment [G. M. D'Ariano and C. Macchiavello, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3131 (1998)] tried to reestablish a 0.5 efficiency bound for loss compensation in optical homodyne tomography. In our reply we demonstrate that neither does such a rigorous bound exist nor is the bound required for ruling out the state reconstruction of an individual system [G. M. D'Ariano and H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2832 (1996)].",

keywords = "OPTICAL HOMODYNE TOMOGRAPHY, DENSITY-MATRIX, NUMBER, STATISTICS, DISTRIBUTIONS, VACUUM, FIELD",

author = "T Kiss and U Herzog and Ulf Leonhardt",

year = "1998",

month = apr,

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "3134--3135",

journal = "Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics",

issn = "1050-2947",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply on the Comment on Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements

AU - Kiss, T

AU - Herzog, U

AU - Leonhardt, Ulf

PY - 1998/4

Y1 - 1998/4

N2 - The authors of the preceding Comment [G. M. D'Ariano and C. Macchiavello, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3131 (1998)] tried to reestablish a 0.5 efficiency bound for loss compensation in optical homodyne tomography. In our reply we demonstrate that neither does such a rigorous bound exist nor is the bound required for ruling out the state reconstruction of an individual system [G. M. D'Ariano and H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2832 (1996)].

AB - The authors of the preceding Comment [G. M. D'Ariano and C. Macchiavello, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3131 (1998)] tried to reestablish a 0.5 efficiency bound for loss compensation in optical homodyne tomography. In our reply we demonstrate that neither does such a rigorous bound exist nor is the bound required for ruling out the state reconstruction of an individual system [G. M. D'Ariano and H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2832 (1996)].

KW - OPTICAL HOMODYNE TOMOGRAPHY

KW - DENSITY-MATRIX

KW - NUMBER

KW - STATISTICS

KW - DISTRIBUTIONS

KW - VACUUM

KW - FIELD

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0005416944

M3 - Article

SN - 1050-2947

VL - 57

SP - 3134

EP - 3135

JO - Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics

JF - Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics

ER -

Reply on the Comment on Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this