Remote warfare as “security of being”: reading security force assistance as an ontological security routine

Malte Riemann, Norma Rossi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses remote warfare from an ontological security perspective, arguing that remote warfare needs to be understood as a response to states’ internal self-identity needs. We develop this claim by analysing an emerging aspect of remote warfare: Security Force Assistance (SFA). SFA is aimed at building up the security forces of partners, sharing best practice, assisting in security sector reform, fostering collaboration, and overall contributing to conflict resolution. Focusing on the UK, we show how and why ontological security needs are a driving force behind the UK’s SFA program. We outline the UK’s specific autobiographical narrative, which we call a “global engagement identity,” explore the crises that induced ontological insecurity, and show how the UK’s SFA program can be read as a routinised foreign policy practice aimed at taming uncertainty and reinforcing ontological security. This paper makes three contributions. First, it analyses remote warfare through an ontological security framework, thereby moving the focus from “security-as-survival” to “security-of-being.” Second, it highlights the importance of SFA as a remote warfare tool. Third, it shows the centrality of ontological security in understanding UK defence policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-507
Number of pages19
JournalDefence Studies
Volume21
Issue number4
Early online date10 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • British Foreign
  • Defence Policy
  • Ontological Security
  • Remote Warfare
  • Security force assistance
  • State Identity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remote warfare as “security of being”: reading security force assistance as an ontological security routine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this