Religious naturalism: the current debate

Mikael Leidenhag

doi:10.1111/phc3.12510

Religious naturalism: the current debate

Mikael Leidenhag

School of Divinity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper provides a survey of contemporary religious naturalism. It presents reductive and non‐reductive versions of religious naturalism, and some arguments in favour of this naturalistic perspective. Finally, it discusses three crucial demarcation issues that contemporary religious naturalism faces.

Original language	English
Article number	e12510
Journal	Philosophy Compass
Volume	13
Issue number	8
Early online date	28 May 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12510
Publication status	Published - 6 Aug 2018

Keywords

Religious naturalism

Access to Document

10.1111/phc3.12510

Cite this

@article{d5a86dea03d84b459065ec00098b6733,

title = "Religious naturalism: the current debate",

abstract = "This paper provides a survey of contemporary religious naturalism. It presents reductive and non‐reductive versions of religious naturalism, and some arguments in favour of this naturalistic perspective. Finally, it discusses three crucial demarcation issues that contemporary religious naturalism faces.",

keywords = "Religious naturalism",

author = "Mikael Leidenhag",

year = "2018",

month = aug,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1111/phc3.12510",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "Philosophy Compass",

issn = "1747-9991",

publisher = "Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111)",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religious naturalism

T2 - the current debate

AU - Leidenhag, Mikael

PY - 2018/8/6

Y1 - 2018/8/6

N2 - This paper provides a survey of contemporary religious naturalism. It presents reductive and non‐reductive versions of religious naturalism, and some arguments in favour of this naturalistic perspective. Finally, it discusses three crucial demarcation issues that contemporary religious naturalism faces.

AB - This paper provides a survey of contemporary religious naturalism. It presents reductive and non‐reductive versions of religious naturalism, and some arguments in favour of this naturalistic perspective. Finally, it discusses three crucial demarcation issues that contemporary religious naturalism faces.

KW - Religious naturalism

U2 - 10.1111/phc3.12510

DO - 10.1111/phc3.12510

M3 - Article

SN - 1747-9991

VL - 13

JO - Philosophy Compass

JF - Philosophy Compass

IS - 8

M1 - e12510

ER -

Religious naturalism: the current debate

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this