Abstract
Two studies (N1 = 193; N2 = 598) were conducted in Poland to examine the role of two types of ingroup commitment (i.e., national narcissism and national identification) as predictors of atti-tudes towards immigrants and refugees (disadvantaged groups) and intentions to engage in collective action against them. As predicted, national narcissism (but not national identification) was related to more hostile intergroup attitudes and greater willingness to engage in collective action against refugees and immigrants. The positive effect of national narcissism on intentions to engage in collective action against immigrants and refugees was mediated by attitudes towards those groups. These results show that applying a more fine-grained approach to ingroup commitment (e.g., national narcissism vs. national identification) among advantaged group members allows for a better understanding of their intergroup attitudes and behavioral intentions to actively oppose the rights of disadvantaged social groups via collective action.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258-271 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | International Journal of Intercultural Relations |
| Volume | 86 |
| Early online date | 27 Dec 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ingroup commitment
- National narcissism
- National identification
- System-supporting collective action
- Intergroup attitudes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Refugees unwelcome: narcissistic and secure national commitment differentially predict collective action against immigrants and refugees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver