Abstract
This paper examines the kind of epistemic circularity which, according to Ernest Sosa, is unavoidably entailed whenever one has what he calls 'reflective' knowledge (that is, knowledge that p such that the knower reflectively endorses the reliability of the epistemic sources by which she came to her belief that p). I begin by describing the relevant kind of circularity and its role in Sosa's epistemology, en route presenting and resisting Sosa's arguments that this kind of circularity is not vicious. Then I consider the somewhat complex relationship between Sosa's views on epistemic circularity and his response to the Problem of Easy Knowledge, arguing that (on one interpretation of Sosa, at least) a complete solution to that problem cannot be extracted from Sosa's work unless the aforementioned epistemic circularity can be proved non-vicious.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 305-325 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Philosophical Papers |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
AHRC - Basic Knowledge: Basic Knowledge
Wright, C. (PI)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
1/09/07 → 31/08/12
Project: Standard
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver