Abstract
Trivers and Willard hypothesized that vertebrates adaptively vary the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the mother's physical condition [Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. (1973) Science 179,90-92]. This hypothesis has produced considerable debate within evolutionary biology. Here we use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate claims that nonhuman primate females facultatively adjust the sex ratio of their progeny in relation to their own dominance rank in a uniform way. The magnitude of the difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females declines as sample sizes increase, and the mean difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females is zero. These results suggest that the observed effects could be the product of stochastic variation in small samples. These findings indicate that presently we cannot reject the null hypothesis that maternal dominance rank is unrelated to birth sex ratios.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11252-11255 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue number | 17 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Aug 2002 |
Keywords
- LOCAL RESOURCE COMPETITION
- LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS
- CAPTIVE JAPANESE MACAQUES
- LONG-TAILED MACAQUES
- RHESUS MACAQUES
- SOCIAL RANK
- MACACA-FASCICULARIS
- DOMINANCE RANK
- RED DEER
- FACULTATIVE ADJUSTMENT