Abstract
Contrastivism about reasons is the view that ‘reason’ expresses a relation with an argument place for a set of alternatives. This is in opposition to a more traditional theory on which reasons are reasons for things simpliciter. I argue that contrastivism provides a solution to a puzzle involving reason claims that explicitly employ ‘rather than’. Contrastivism solves the puzzle by allowing that some fact might be a reason for an action out of one set of alternatives without being a reason for that action out of a different set of alternatives.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 231-242 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 166 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 6 Oct 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Contrastivism
- Reasons
- Reason ascriptions
- Practical reasoning