Quantifying GC-biased gene conversion in great ape genomes using polymorphism-aware models

Rui Borges, Gergely Szöllősi, Carolin Kosiol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As multi-individual population-scale data is becoming available, more-complex modeling strategies are needed to quantify the genome-wide patterns of nucleotide usage and associated mechanisms of evolution. Recently, the multivariate neutral Moran model was proposed. However, it was shown insufficient to explain the distribution of alleles in great apes. Here, we propose a new model that includes allelic selection. Our theoretical results constitute the basis of a new Bayesian framework to estimate mutation rates and selection coefficients from population data. We employ the new framework to a great ape dataset at we found patterns of allelic selection that match those of genome-wide GC-biased gene conversion (gBCG). In particular, we show that great apes have patterns of allelic selection that vary in intensity, a feature that we correlated with the great apes' distinct demographies. We also demonstrate that the AT/GC toggling effect decreases the probability of a substitution, promoting more polymorphisms in the base composition of great ape genomes. We further assess the impact of CG-bias in molecular analysis and we find that mutation rates and genetic distances are estimated under bias when gBGC is not properly accounted. Our results contribute to the discussion on the tempo and mode of gBGC evolution, while stressing the need for gBGC-aware models in population genetics and phylogenetics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1336
JournalGenetics
Volume212
Issue number4
Early online date30 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Moran model
  • Boundary mutations
  • Allelic selection
  • Great apes
  • GC-bais
  • gBGC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying GC-biased gene conversion in great ape genomes using polymorphism-aware models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this