PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: a systematic review of tools and approaches

James Lewis; Sarah Marsden; Adrian Cherney; Martine Zeuthen; Jocelyn J. Bélanger; Anastasiia Zubareva; Jürgen Brandsch; Mauro Lubrano

doi:10.1002/cl2.1301

PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: a systematic review of tools and approaches

James Lewis, Sarah Marsden^*, Adrian Cherney, Martine Zeuthen, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Anastasiia Zubareva, Jürgen Brandsch, Mauro Lubrano

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of International Relations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an 'overview of reviews' that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

Original language	English
Article number	e1301
Number of pages	35
Journal	Campbell Systematic Reviews
Volume	19
Issue number	1
Early online date	5 Feb 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1301
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Access to Document

10.1002/cl2.1301Licence: CC BY

Lewis_2023_CSR_PROTOCOL-Case-management_CC
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 3.81 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{aa13d5c274ec47df857e4cba638b634c,

title = "PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: a systematic review of tools and approaches",

abstract = "This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an 'overview of reviews' that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.",

author = "James Lewis and Sarah Marsden and Adrian Cherney and Martine Zeuthen and B{\'e}langer, \{Jocelyn J.\} and Anastasiia Zubareva and J{\"u}rgen Brandsch and Mauro Lubrano",

note = "Funding: This review is funded by a Campbell Collaboration grant awarded to Sarah Marsden via Public Safety Canada.",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/cl2.1301",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

journal = "Campbell Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1891-1803",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence

T2 - a systematic review of tools and approaches

AU - Lewis, James

AU - Marsden, Sarah

AU - Cherney, Adrian

AU - Zeuthen, Martine

AU - Bélanger, Jocelyn J.

AU - Zubareva, Anastasiia

AU - Brandsch, Jürgen

AU - Lubrano, Mauro

N1 - Funding: This review is funded by a Campbell Collaboration grant awarded to Sarah Marsden via Public Safety Canada.

PY - 2023/3/1

Y1 - 2023/3/1

N2 - This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an 'overview of reviews' that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

AB - This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an 'overview of reviews' that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85150701377

U2 - 10.1002/cl2.1301

DO - 10.1002/cl2.1301

M3 - Review article

SN - 1891-1803

VL - 19

JO - Campbell Systematic Reviews

JF - Campbell Systematic Reviews

IS - 1

M1 - e1301

ER -

PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: a systematic review of tools and approaches

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this