Proprioceptive deafferentation slows down the processing of visual hand feedback

Daniela Balslev*, R. Chris Miall, Jonathan Cole

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)


During visually guided movements both vision and proprioception inform the brain about the position of the hand, so interaction between these two modalities is presumed. Current theories suggest that this interaction occurs by sensory information from both sources being fused into a more reliable, multimodal, percept of hand location. In the literature on perception, however, there is evidence that different sensory modalities interact in the allocation of attention, so that a stimulus in one modality facilitates the processing of a stimulus in a different modality. We investigated whether proprioception facilitates the processing of visual information during motor control. Subjects used a computer mouse to move a cursor to a screen target. In 28% of the trials, pseudorandomly, the cursor was rotated or the target jumped. Reaction time for the trajectory correction in response to this perturbation was compared under conditions with normal and reduced proprioception after 1-Hz rTMS over the hand-contralateral somatosensory cortex. Proprioceptive deafferentation slowed down the reaction time for initiating a motor correction in response to a visual perturbation in hand position, but not to a target jump. Correlation analyses suggested that reaction time was influenced by the size of the visual error rather than the visuo-proprioceptive conflict or the variance in cursor position. We suggest that during movements intact proprioception is necessary for the rapid processing of visual feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Article number12
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Vision
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2007


  • visual
  • proprioceptive
  • motor control
  • multisensory interaction


Dive into the research topics of 'Proprioceptive deafferentation slows down the processing of visual hand feedback'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this