Prolegomenon to any future neo-logicist set theory: extensionality and indefinite extensibility

Stewart Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the prospects for a neo-logicist development of set theory based on a restriction of Frege's Basic Law V, which we call (RV):

For AllPFor AllQ[Ext(P) = Ext(Q) equivalent to [(BAD(P) BAD(Q)) boolean OR For Allx(Px equivalent to Qx)]]

BAD is taken as a primitive property of properties. We explore the features it must have for (RV) to sanction the various strong axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. The primary interpretation is where 'BAD' is Dummett's 'indefinitely extensible'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-91
Number of pages33
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume54
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prolegomenon to any future neo-logicist set theory: extensionality and indefinite extensibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this