Primate Social Cognition: Uniquely Primate, Uniquely Social, or Just Unique?

Richard William Byrne, Lucy A. Bates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Primates undoubtedly have impressive abilities in perceiving, recognizing, manipulating, and predicting other individuals, but only great apes seem to recognize the cognitive basis of manipulative and cooperative tactics or the concept of self. None of these abilities is unique to primates. We distinguish (1) a package of quantitative advantages in social sophistication, perhaps based on more efficient memory, in which neocortical enlargement is associated with the challenge of social living; from (2) a qualitative difference in understanding, whose taxonomic distribution including several distantly related species, including birds does not point to an evolutionary origin in social challenges and may instead relate to a need to acquire novel ways of dealing with the physical world. The ability of great apes to learn new manual routines by parsing action components may have driven their qualitatively greater social skill, suggesting that strict partition of physical and social cognition is likely to be misleading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-830
Number of pages16
JournalNeuron
Volume65
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2010

Keywords

  • CHIMPANZEES PAN-TROGLODYTES
  • FOLLOW GAZE DIRECTION
  • ORANGUTANS PONGO-PYGMAEUS
  • RANGING VERVET MONKEYS
  • WILD CAPUCHIN MONKEYS
  • LONG-TAILED MACAQUES
  • OBJECT-CHOICE TASK
  • SELF-RECOGNITION
  • RHESUS-MONKEYS
  • NEOCORTEX SIZE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Primate Social Cognition: Uniquely Primate, Uniquely Social, or Just Unique?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this