Abstract
In eighteenth-century Britain, there was more than one way of thinking
about poverty. For some, poverty was an essentially moral problem.
Another way of conceiving of poverty was in economic terms. In this
article, however, I want to consider some eighteenth-century versions of
the idea that poverty might be a political issue. What I have in
mind is the idea that a society containing a large proportion of very
poor people might be, just for that reason, an unstable and disordered
society. I argue, first, that this idea is central to Smith's treatment
of poverty in The Wealth of Nations. Then, after a brief account
of how Paine and Godwin imagined the end of poverty, I describe the
further development and refinement of Smithian lines of thought in Burke
and Malthus. My conclusion is that Smith, Burke, and Malthus constitute
evidence that present-day ideas of social justice derive more from the
nineteenth century and subsequent developments in moral and political
thought than from the early modern period.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 63-81 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | The Southern Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 23 Mar 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 May 2023 |