Population-specific social dynamics in chimpanzees

Edwin J.C. Van Leeuwen*, Katherine A. Cronin, Daniel B.M. Haun

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding intraspecific variation in sociality is essential for characterizing the flexibility and evolution of social systems, yet its study in nonhuman animals is rare. Here, we investigated whether chimpanzees exhibit population-level differences in sociality that cannot be easily explained by differences in genetics or ecology. We compared social proximity and grooming tendencies across four semiwild populations of chimpanzees living in the same ecological environment over three consecutive years, using both linear mixed models and social network analysis. Results indicated temporally stable, population-level differences in dyadic-level sociality. Moreover, group cohesion measures capturing network characteristics beyond dyadic interactions (clustering, modularity, and social differentiation) showed population-level differences consistent with the dyadic indices. Subsequently, we explored whether the observed intraspecific variation in sociality could be attributed to cultural processes by ruling out alternative sources of variation including the influences of ecology, genetics, and differences in population demographics. We conclude that substantial variation in social behavior exists across neighboring populations of chimpanzees and that this variation is in part shaped by cultural processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11393-11400
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume115
Issue number45
Early online date5 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Animal culture
  • Behavioral diversity
  • Chimpanzees
  • Social learning
  • Sociality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Population-specific social dynamics in chimpanzees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this